Shorter publications
- David G. Stork, "Hoodwinked
by Hockney?" Letter to the editor, Art in America,
15, July 2002.
- Peter Weiss, "Reflections
on art," Science News, pages 346-9, 163(22),
May 31, 2003 (with cover)
- Barry Mazor, "Optical
Projection in Renaissance Art: Did the great masters cheat?" Advanced Imaging magazine, pages 9,10,12,13,44, June 2003
(with cover)
- Sebastian Smee, "Optical
Allusions," London Daily Times, July 29, 2003.
- Marguerite Rigoglioso, "Masters
of deception?" Stanford magazine, November-December,
60-65, 2003; response
letters, January-February 2004.
- David G. Stork, "Scientific
evidence for humanists," The Chronicle Review, August,
2004.
- Senay Boztas, "Hockney
pet theory challenged," The Sunday Herald (Edinburgh),
August 22, 2004.
- Sarah Boxer, "Computer
people reopen art history dispute," The New York
Times, B1,B5, August 26, 2004.
- "Did
Renaissance Artists Use Optical Projections or Didn't They?" Photonics.com, October 8, 2004.
- "Scientists
debate the theory that Renaissance masters used optical projections
to complete their works," Inside Science News Service,
American Institute of Physics, December 2004.
- Richard Mullins, "Science
fuels art fight: Optics forum is also stage for mirror magic," Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, October 14, 2004.
- Toni Feder, "Debate
over optics in early art is focus at OSA," Physics
Today, 57(12):31-32 December 2004.
- Colleen Morrison, "Exploring
new frontiers in Rochester," Optics and Photonics
News, 15(12):12-13, December 2004.
- Duncan Graham-Rowe, "Hockney
'was wrong' over art copying claim," New Scientist, 2482:23, Jan. 15, 2005.
- Mary Lou Finley, interview with David Stork, "As it
happens," CBC Radio,
Monday, January 17, 2005.
- Tim Cornwell, "Expert
rebuffs Hockney claim that Old Masters traced their paintings," The Scotsman, Thursday, January 13, 2005.
- AFP Features, "Scientists
ready rebuttal to Hockney's 'copying' claim," Yahoo
News, Wednesday, January 12, 2005.
- New Scientist editors, "Renaissance puzzle," New Scientist, January 15, 2005.
- Tom Anderson, "Science
backs Old Masters versus Hockney in 'tracing' row," The Independent on Sunday, January 23, 2005.
- David G. Stork, Note
in response to Hockney, Scientific American, p. 14,
April 2005.
- Eric J. Lerner, "Van
Eyck's Dividers: Simple Geometry?" Optics and Photonics
News, 16(7/8): 9, 2005.
- David G. Stork, Letter
in response to Lawrence Weschler, Harper's magazine,
p. 5, August 2005.
- David Ganzi, "Scientist
rebukes theory of optics use in Renaissance art," Daily
Free Press, Boston University, December 12, 2006.
- David G. Stork, "Optics
& Old Masters" (in support of Steven C. Munson's
"Rembrandt & the Artist's Touch"), Commentary,
vol. 123(6), p. 14, June, 2007.
- David G. Stork and Marco Duarte, "Revisiting
computer image analysis and art," response to Charles
Falco, IEEE Multimedia 14(3):108-109, July-September,
2007.
- David G. Stork, "Computer
image analysis in the study of art," Vision Systems
Design 12(12):7, 2007
- David G. Stork, "Learning-based authentication of Jackson Pollock's drip paintings," SPIE Newsroom, 27 May, 2009, DOI: 10.1117/2.1200905.1643 (pdf)
- Blake Gopnik, "Shedding new light: David Stork uses science to see a world of art through old masters' eyes," Washington Post, Sunday April 26, 2009 (page 1, page 2)
- Andrea Kirsh, "Help from the computer lab," TheArtBlog.com, August 14, 2009
- Interview, Lunch special, KZSU-FM, Stanford, CA, November 2, 2009
Return to main page