Shorter publications

• David G. Stork, "Hoodwinked by Hockney?" Letter to the editor, Art in America, 15, July 2002.
• Peter Weiss, "Reflections on art," Science News, pages 346-9, 163(22), May 31, 2003 (with cover)
• Barry Mazor, "Optical Projection in Renaissance Art: Did the great masters cheat?" Advanced Imaging magazine, pages 9,10,12,13,44, June 2003 (with cover)
• Sebastian Smee, "Optical Allusions," London Daily Times, July 29, 2003.
• Marguerite Rigoglioso, "Masters of deception?" Stanford magazine, November-December, 60-65, 2003; response letters, January-February 2004.
• David G. Stork, "Scientific evidence for humanists," The Chronicle Review, August, 2004.
• Senay Boztas, "Hockney pet theory challenged," The Sunday Herald (Edinburgh), August 22, 2004.
• Sarah Boxer, "Computer people reopen art history dispute," The New York Times, B1,B5, August 26, 2004.
• "Did Renaissance Artists Use Optical Projections or Didn't They?" Photonics.com, October 8, 2004.
• "Scientists debate the theory that Renaissance masters used optical projections to complete their works," Inside Science News Service, American Institute of Physics, December 2004.
• Richard Mullins, "Science fuels art fight: Optics forum is also stage for mirror magic," Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, October 14, 2004.
• Toni Feder, "Debate over optics in early art is focus at OSA," Physics Today, 57(12):31-32 December 2004.
• Colleen Morrison, "Exploring new frontiers in Rochester," Optics and Photonics News, 15(12):12-13, December 2004.
• Duncan Graham-Rowe, "Hockney 'was wrong' over art copying claim," New Scientist, 2482:23, Jan. 15, 2005.
• Mary Lou Finley, interview with David Stork, "As it happens," CBC Radio, Monday, January 17, 2005.
• Tim Cornwell, "Expert rebuffs Hockney claim that Old Masters traced their paintings," The Scotsman, Thursday, January 13, 2005.
• AFP Features, "Scientists ready rebuttal to Hockney's 'copying' claim," Yahoo News, Wednesday, January 12, 2005.
• New Scientist editors, "Renaissance puzzle," New Scientist, January 15, 2005.
• Tom Anderson, "Science backs Old Masters versus Hockney in 'tracing' row," The Independent on Sunday, January 23, 2005.
• David G. Stork, Note in response to Hockney, Scientific American, p. 14, April 2005.
• Eric J. Lerner, "Van Eyck's Dividers: Simple Geometry?" Optics and Photonics News, 16(7/8): 9, 2005.
• David G. Stork, Letter in response to Lawrence Weschler, Harper's magazine, p. 5, August 2005.
• David Ganzi, "Scientist rebukes theory of optics use in Renaissance art," Daily Free Press, Boston University, December 12, 2006.
• David G. Stork, "Optics & Old Masters" (in support of Steven C. Munson's "Rembrandt & the Artist's Touch"), Commentary, vol. 123(6), p. 14, June, 2007.
• David G. Stork and Marco Duarte, "Revisiting computer image analysis and art," response to Charles Falco, IEEE Multimedia 14(3):108-109, July-September, 2007.
• David G. Stork, "Computer image analysis in the study of art," Vision Systems Design 12(12):7, 2007
• David G. Stork, "Learning-based authentication of Jackson Pollock's drip paintings," SPIE Newsroom, 27 May, 2009, DOI: 10.1117/2.1200905.1643 (pdf)
• Blake Gopnik, "Shedding new light: David Stork uses science to see a world of art through old masters' eyes," Washington Post, Sunday April 26, 2009 (page 1, page 2)
• Andrea Kirsh, "Help from the computer lab," TheArtBlog.com, August 14, 2009
• Interview, Lunch special, KZSU-FM, Stanford, CA, November 2, 2009

Return to main page